2. The Control Unit Dilemma: Hardwired vs. Microprogrammed
The fundamental problem of generating control signals, introduced in Section 1.0, is solved by two distinct design philosophies. This choice between a "hardwired" and a "microprogrammed" control unit represents a classic engineering trade-off between speed and flexibility.
-
2.1 Hardwired Control
-
Implementation: A hardwired control unit is a fixed, sequential logic circuit. Its logic is built directly from gates (AND, OR, NOT) and flip-flops, which together form a complex Finite State Machine (FSM). The 4-bit
opcodefrom the instruction, along with status flags and the current state, are fed into this combinatorial logic, which in turn generates the specific output signals (RAI,PCO,SUB, etc.) for that clock cycle. -
Analogy: This design is analogous to a custom-built, high-speed machine designed for one specific task, like a specialized factory robot. It is built from the ground up to perform its one job as fast as possible.
-
Pros: Its primary advantage is speed. Because the control signals are generated directly by logic gates, the propagation delay is minimal, allowing for a very high clock speed.
-
Cons: The design is extremely inflexible. If a bug is found or a new instruction needs to be added (e.g., adding a
SUBinstruction to a CPU that only hasADD), the entire logic circuit must be redesigned, re-manufactured, and replaced. This makes it complex to design and nearly impossible to modify or upgrade.
-
-
2.2 Microprogrammed Control
-
Implementation: This is the alternative, flexible, memory-based approach. In this design, the Control Unit is not a complex web of gates but rather a small, simple "computer-within-a-computer." This internal computer has its own simple program (a microprogram) stored in a special, high-speed memory called a Control Store.
-
Analogy: Instead of a custom-built robot, this is like a general-purpose, programmable robot. To execute a command like "ADD," it runs a small, internal program (a "micro-routine") that tells it, step-by-step, how to activate the necessary hardware components to perform the addition.
-
Pros: The primary advantage is flexibility. To add a new instruction, one simply adds a new micro-routine to the Control Store's memory (firmware). This makes the design process systematic and far easier to debug and upgrade.
-
Cons: Its main disadvantage is speed. It is inherently slower than a hardwired unit because it must perform an extra memory access (fetching the micro-instruction from the Control Store) for every clock cycle.
-
-
2.3 Comparison Table
| Feature | Hardwired Control (FSM) | Microprogrammed Control |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation | Sequential logic circuit (gates, flip-flops) | Control Store (ROM) & Sequencer |
| Speed | Very Fast (low propagation delay) | Slower (extra memory access) |
| Flexibility | Very Low. Difficult to modify. | Very High. Can be updated (firmware). |
| Design Complexity | High, error-prone, and complex to manage. | Systematic, orderly, and easier to debug. |
| Best For | RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computers) | CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computers) |
No comments to display
No comments to display